1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 456 (1959)
 

ADAMS v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Civ. No. 7806.

176 F.Supp. 456 (1959)

Floyd Ardell ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, The Reclamation Board, Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; North American Weather Consultants, and Does 1-50, Inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California, N. D.

September 1, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, and Reginald M. Watt, Chico, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen., and John Robert Burton, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defendants.

HALBERT, District Judge.

There is before the Court a motion by plaintiffs to remand this action to the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Sutter, from which court the case was removed by the State of California and two of its agencies, the Reclamation Board and the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District (hereinafter referred to collectively as the State).

The parties are in agreement as to the bare text to be applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases