WALTER E. HELLER & CO. v. HAMMOND APPLIANCE CO.


29 N.J. 589 (1959)

151 A.2d 537

WALTER E. HELLER & COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, ASSIGNEE OF THE PEERLESS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE HAMMOND APPLIANCE CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 1, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Samuel B. Feld, attorney).

Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for defendant-appellant.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff assignee sued for the price of goods sold and delivered by its assignor, an appliance dealer. Defendant asserted that the sale had been rescinded and counterclaimed for reasonable storage charges arising from the seller's failure to retake the articles in accordance with the agreement of rescission. The trial court dismissed claim and counterclaim. The Appellate Division reversed and directed the entry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases