KINNEAR-WEED CORPORATION v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY

No. 16780.

266 F.2d 352 (1959)

KINNEAR-WEED CORPORATION, Appellant, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Kinnear, Beaumont, Tex., for appellant.

Garrett R. Tucker, Jr., Walter B. Morgan, Houston, Tex., B. D. Orgain, Beaumont, Tex., Frank B. Pugsley, Melvin F. Fincke, Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

We did not intend to read into the claims of appellant's patent, as limitations of that patent, any part of the drawings or of the specifications not expressed or necessarily referred to by implication in those claims. In our opinion, the claims themselves of the reissue patent are limited to a combination rotary drilling tool, bit, or drill, and the patent has not been infringed by the appellee. We correct clerical errors in a sentence in the next to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases