FRANCIS J. KOZESNIK ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 5, 1959.
Decided June 1, 1959.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Ralph S. Mason argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Mason, Griffin & Moore, attorneys; Mr. Ralph S. Mason, of counsel; Mr. Kester R. Pierson, on the brief).
Mr. George W. Allgair argued the cause for respondent Township of Montgomery (Messrs. George W. Allgair and A. Dix Skillman, attorneys; Mr. George W. Allgair, of counsel).
Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III, argued the cause for respondent Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys; Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III, of counsel).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
In Kozesnik v. Montgomery Tp.,24 N.J. 154 (1957), an amendment to the zoning ordinance was declared invalid because of specific infirmities therein described. The township thereafter adopted another amendment free of those infirmities, and that amendment is the subject of the present litigation. The trial court sustained the ordinance. Before us plaintiffs assert the township...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
