ORZECHOWSKI v. HIGGINS


146 Conn. 463 (1959)

PETER ORZECHOWSKI v. AMELIA v. HIGGINS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 26, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. C. Bulkeley, with whom was Harry Schwolsky, for the appellants (defendants).

Thomas J. Hagarty, for the appellee (plaintiff).

BALDWIN, KING, MURPHY, MELLITZ and SHEA, JS.


BALDWIN, J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court entered upon a jury's verdict. They assign error in the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict as not supported by the evidence on the issue of liability and as excessive, in the charge, and in rulings on evidence. Only two of the assigned errors need be considered in order to dispose of this appeal.

We shall consider first a ruling on evidence. The plaintiff was struck...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases