1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 429 (1959)
 

HAROLD F. RITCHIE, INC. v. CHESEBROUGH-POND'S, INC.

176 F.Supp. 429 (1959)

HAROLD F. RITCHIE, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHESEBROUGH-POND'S, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 14, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for plaintiff (Stuart N. Updike and Walter E. Shuttleworth, New York City, of counsel).

White & Case, New York City, for defendant (Thomas Kiernan, Ernest A. Fintel and Wm. Wallace White & Scotti, Edmund D. Scotti, New York City, of counsel).

RYAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Harold F. Ritchie, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, has filed this suit against defendant Chesebrough-Pond's Inc., a New York corporation, alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition.

Jurisdiction is predicated on the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1114, 1121), with pendent jurisdiction of the claim of unfair competition (28 U.S.C.A. § 1338(b)).

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases