1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 267 F.2d
  5. 267 F.2d 337 (1959)
 

DE KORWIN v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO

Nos. 12314-12316, 12395.

267 F.2d 337 (1959)

Margaret DE KORWIN, etc., Plaintiff, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, etc., et al., Defendants. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, as Trustee under the Will of Otto Young, Deceased, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Graveraet Young KAUFMAN, Respondent-Appellee, and Karl C. Jacobs et al., Respondents (Appellants in No. 12314) and Dr. Louis Ruttenberg et al., Respondents (Appellants in No. 12315) and Robert S. Berson et al., Respondents (Appellants in No. 12316). Margaret DE KORWIN etc., Plaintiff-Appellee (No. 12395) v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees (No. 12395). Appeal of Oscar BENNES et al. (Appellants in No. 12395).

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamilton Smith, Louis L. Kahn, Jack A. Diamond, Daniel M. Schuyler, Jay Stough, Joseph R. Julin, Thomas Hart Fisher, Norman Crawford, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Bartlett S. Marimon, William B. McIlvaine, A. Leslie Hodson, Chicago, Ill. (Robert H. Bork, Frederick W. Temple, Howard G. Krane, Clarence E. Fox, George W. Thompson, Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, Chicago, Ill., Wilson & McIlvaine, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), Charles R. Aiken, Richard F. Watt, Chicago, Ill. (Cotton, Fruchtman & Watt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), Frank E. McDonald, A. Bradley Eben, Harold A. Smith, Chicago, Ill. (Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), Jack I. Levy, Chicago, Ill. (Sonnenschein, Lautmann, Levinson, Rieser, Carlin & Nath, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.

Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and PARKINSON and KNOCH, Circuit Judges.

PARKINSON, Circuit Judge.

These four appeals have been consolidated in this opinion inasmuch as they emanate from the same proceeding below and, to some extent, do or may affect the interests of all parties. No. 12314 challenges the validity and seeks reversal of a protective order entered on February 20, 1958 pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. The appellants in No. 12315 have adopted the brief of appellants in No. 12314 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases