The answer contains general denials but it is clear from the factual averments of the moving and answering affidavits that the only controversy is as to certain roof decking invoiced at $839.04 which plaintiff concedes was not delivered but asserts was ordered by defendant and "held by plaintiff for delivery at some future date." There appears to be a factual issue with respect to this alleged transaction and perhaps a question as to the measure of damages if the transaction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
