Claimant was employed as a superintendent in the employer's apartment building. As part of the compensation an apartment was given claimant and his wife, who helped him in his work. No specific hiring was made of the wife, but the claimant understood that he would not be employed unless he was married and his wife was with him. The issue in this appeal arises over the rate of compensation; the employer and carrier argue that the employment should be deemed that of two persons...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
