1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 174 F.Supp.
  5. 174 F.Supp. 414 (1959)
 

ROBINSON v. STANLEY HOME PRODUCTS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 91-59.

174 F.Supp. 414 (1959)

Albert E. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY HOME PRODUCTS, INC., and William J. Gahm, d/b/a Plura Plastics, Defendants.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

June 29, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Sheeler, Weehawken, N. J., by Vincent Galvin, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Harkavy & Lieb, Newark, N. J., by Jerome S. Lieb, Newark, N. J., for defendant William J. Gahm, d/b/a Plura Plastics.

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

Defendant, William J. Gahm, doing business as Plura Plastics (Plura) has moved for an order striking the amended complaint for prolixity and non-conformity with Rule 8(a) (2) and (e) (1), 28 U.S.C., for failure to state a claim against movant upon which relief can be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter; Rule 12(b) (6) and (1).

The first cause of action alleged is grounded upon §§ 13(c) and (f...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases