1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 7 Wis.2d
  5. 7 Wis.2d 570 (1959)
 

MADISON v. TOLZMANN

7 Wis.2d 570 (1959)

CITY OF MADISON, Respondent, v. TOLZMANN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 26, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Tobias C. Tolzmann of Honolulu, Hawaii, in pro. per., and Aberg, Bell, Blake & Metzner of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by William J. P. Aberg and Robert K. Aberg.

For the respondent there was a brief by Harold E. Hanson, city attorney, and Henry B. Buslee, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Buslee.

BROADFOOT, J.

No issue is raised before this court as to the validity of sec. 14.28 (7) (a) of Madison general ordinances. It is conceded that the state could delegate to cities authority to enact safety regulations relating to boats and the equipment thereof and that it had done so by sec. 30.06 (7), Stats. Therefore the judgment of $5 must be affirmed, with $5 costs.

The defendant contends that the section of the ordinance providing for the licensing of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases