Appellant contests the finding that its payment of wages within the period of three years prior to the reopening of the case constituted a payment of compensation within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law, so as to relieve the respondent Special Fund. Appellant asserts that the payments were made pursuant to its established policy of paying supervisory personnel when off from work and urges that the board's decision should therefore be reversed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
