DUNITZ v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 23490.

170 Cal.App.2d 399 (1959)

338 P.2d 1001

GERALD DUNITZ et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

May 18, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dunlap, Holmes, Ross & Woodson for Appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, and Marcus E. Crahan, Jr., Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.


NOURSE, J. pro tem.*

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing the action entered after defendants' demurrer to the complaint as amended had been sustained without leave to amend.1

By their complaint plaintiffs sought to have the court declare "that Sections 91.0103, 96.101, 96.101.2, 96.112, 96.119 and 96.121 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code" as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases