1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 170 F.Supp.
  5. 170 F.Supp. 394 (1959)
 

UNITED STATES v. DE CICCO

170 F.Supp. 394 (1959)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Daniel DE CICCO, d/b/a Valentino Blouse Co., Countess Blouse, Inc., Suzette Blouse Co., Inc., and Charles Kreindler, As Financial Secretary of Blouse & Waistmakers' Union, Local 25, I.L.G. W.U., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 30, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Christy, U. S. Atty., New York City, for plaintiff, Nicholas Tsoucalas, New York City, of counsel.

Frank Aronsky, New York City, for defendant Suzette Blouse Co., Inc.

Muhlstock & Blei, New York City, for defendant Countess Blouse, Inc.

Lieberman, Katz & Aronson, New York City, for defendant Charles Kreindler, as Financial Secretary of Blouse & Waistmakers' Union, Local 25, I.L.G. W.U.

BICKS, District Judge.

The issue presented on this motion for summary judgment is whether defendants Countess Blouse, Inc., and Suzette Blouse Co., Inc. should be required to pay over to the United States Government the amounts of their indebtednesses to the taxpayer, defendant Daniel De Cicco, $806.00 and $447.26 respectively. It is conceded that such amounts were owing to the taxpayer on the date the United States Government caused notices of levy to be served on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases