IN RE BANNER


31 N.J. 24 (1959)

155 A.2d 81

IN THE MATTER OF FREDERICK E. BANNER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 26, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William D. Danberry argued the cause for the Middlesex County Ethics and Grievance Committee.

Mr. Morris Spritzer argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The presentment filed found respondent guilty of unprofessional conduct by delaying the disbursement of clients' funds and by utilizing those funds for his personal purposes in the interim in violation of Canon 11: "Money of the client or collected for the client or other trust property coming into the possession of the lawyer should be reported and accounted for promptly, and should not under any circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases