1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 28 N.J.
  5. 28 N.J. 519 (1959)
 

SARNER v. SARNER

28 N.J. 519 (1959)

147 A.2d 244

JULIA SARNER, PLAINTIFF, v. SIDNEY SARNER, DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF SIDNEY SARNER, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT, APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Aaron W. Nussman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Back, Nussman & Rose, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge CONFORD in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR — 7.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases