MATTER OF PEABODY


5 N.Y.2d 541 (1959)

In the Matter of the Amendment to a Trust Agreement between Judith D. Peabody, as Grantor, and Elizabeth T. Dunnington et al., as Trustees. Chase Manhattan Bank et al., Respondents; Howard M. Holtzmann, as Guardian ad Litem for Elizabeth T. Peabody, an Infant, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 16, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard M. Holtzmann, in person, and Frank P. Broz for Howard M. Holtzmann, appellant.

Peyton H. Moss and Paul H. Fox for Judith Dunnington Peabody, respondent.

No appearance for remaining respondents.

Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE concur.


FULD, J.

Whether or not a child en ventre sa mere is a "person beneficially interested" in a trust, within the meaning of section 23 of the Personal Property Law, is the sole question presented. If it is such a person, then, there may be no revocation of the trust even though all the living beneficiaries interested have given their consents.

On May 11, 1951, five days after reaching her twenty-first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases