TRASK v. KAM, EXEC. EST. TAM SEE, DECSD.

No. 4058.

44 Haw. 10 (1959)

352 P.2d 320

ARTHUR K. TRASK v. WILLIAM K. KAM, EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF TAM SEE, DECEASED (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR TAM SEE, DECEASED) AND JAMES K. MURAKAMI, AUDITOR OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

December 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel G. Ridley for defendant-appellant.

Richard D. Welsh and Thomas M. Waddoups (Robertson, Castle & Anthony) and Arthur K. Trask (on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

TSUKIYAMA, C.J., MARUMOTO, CASSIDY, WIRTZ AND LEWIS, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT BY WIRTZ, J.

The above-entitled case comes before this court on appeal from the judgment entered in the circuit court of the first circuit on November 8, 1957. Since the appeal was perfected, the original defendant-appellant Tam See died and William K. Kam, as executor under the will and of the estate of Tam See, deceased, was, by order of this court substituted in her place. For convenience, however, all references herein to defendant-appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases