WOLF v. GLAZER


17 Misc.2d 522 (1959)

Emanuel Wolf et al., Respondents, v. Nathan Glazer et al., Copartners Doing Business as Gemelli & Moccia, Defendants, and Nathan Glazer, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

March 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lipton & Silverstein (Paul N. Wiener of counsel), for appellant.

Max E. Greenberg and Louis Cantor for respondents.

Concur — PETTE, HART and DI GIOVANNA, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to the defendant Glazer and motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted to the extent that judgment is rendered in favor of the appellant Glazer against the plaintiff on the second and third causes of action, without costs. Severance of the action against Glazer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases