SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO. v. REMINGTON RECORDS, INC.

No. 86, Docket 25216.

265 F.2d 263 (1959)

SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. REMINGTON RECORDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Appellant, Donald H. Gabor, Defendant. OXFORD MUSIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. REMINGTON RECORDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Appellant, Donald H. Gabor, Defendant. ST. NICHOLAS MUSIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. REMINGTON RECORDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Appellant, Donald H. Gabor, Defendant. MERIDIAN MUSIC CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. REMINGTON RECORDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Appellant, Donald H. Gabor, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided April 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julian T. Abeles, New York City (Abeles & Bernstein, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants-appellees.

Maxwell Okun, New York City, for defendant-appellee-appellant.

Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


BURGER,* Circuit Judges.

Four different plaintiffs, all music publishers, brought suit against Donald H. Gabor and Remington Records, Inc. Gabor and his wife own all the stock of Remington, a phonograph record manufacturer and distributor.1 These actions were brought under the provisions of the Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and 28 U.S.C. § 1338) relating to the compulsory licensing of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases