GOETZEL v. GOETZEL

No. 35857.

169 Ohio St. 350 (1959)

GOETZEL, APPELLEE, v. GOETZEL (DIETZ, EXRX., SUBSTITUTED DEFENDANT), APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 17, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Falk and Mr. Samuel Plotnick, for appellee.

Mr. Harry Kasfir and Mr. Fred Weiland, for appellant.


TAFT, J.

As indicated in the foregoing statement of the case, the wife, in the prior divorce proceeding, not only sought alimony from the husband but she also pleaded in her cross-petition and amended cross-petition the 1942 agreement to convey the Arbor Place property, and she asked the court to order the husband to specifically perform that agreement. In the instant case she pleads the same agreement and asks for the same relief.

Although the wife did amend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases