SHAPIRO v. COUNTY COMM.

[No. 160, September Term, 1958.]

219 Md. 298 (1959)

149 A.2d 396

SHAPIRO ET AL. v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 17, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Brooke, with whom were Shriver & Brooke on the brief, for the appellants.

Thomas E. Jones, Robert B. Mathias and Robert Diemer, with whom were William L. Kahler and Charles M. Irelan on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ., and KEATING, J., Associate Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.


PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellees filed a motion to dismiss the present appeal "since Rule 828 b 1 (b) * * * has not been met * * *." They complain that a deed filed as an exhibit with the bill of complaint was not included in the record extract. We think the record, as presented, is sufficient for a determination of the questions involved in the appeal; consequently, the motion to dismiss is overruled.

The court below sustained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases