1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 30 N.J.
  5. 30 N.J. 470 (1959)
 

IN RE DePAMPHILIS

30 N.J. 470 (1959)

153 A.2d 680

IN THE MATTER OF DANTE DePAMPHILIS, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. IN THE MATTER OF LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 31, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Abram A. Lebson argued the causes for the Bergen County Ethics and Grievance Committee.

Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for respondent DePamphilis (Messrs. Gross and Gross, attorneys; Mr. Albert S. Gross, of counsel).

Mr. Walter D. Van Riper argued the cause for respondent Friedman (Messrs. Van Riper and Belmont, attorneys; Mr. Van Riper, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.

The Bergen County Ethics and Grievance Committee filed separate presentments charging each respondent with unethical and unprofessional conduct "in recommending the transfer of properties in an attempt to defraud creditors and to file bankruptcy proceedings and in his participation in the actual transfer of properties * * *." The ethical problem involved has not previously been the subject of consideration by this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases