RICHFIELD OIL CORP. v. FRANCHISE TAX BD.

Docket No. 9568.

169 Cal.App.2d 331 (1959)

337 P.2d 237

RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION (a Corporation), Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

April 1, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Guntert and Robert A. Gaston for Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown and Stanley Mosk, Attorneys General, James E. Sabine and Irving H. Perluss, Assistant Attorneys General, and Edward P. Hollingshead, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.


WARNE, J. pro tem.*

This is an appeal from a judgment denying recovery of additional assessments of franchise taxes paid under protest.

The stipulated statement of facts shows that the Franchise Tax Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as the commissioner), on June 27, 1945, mailed to plaintiff, Richfield Oil Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Richfield), a notice of proposed additional assessment, by which Richfield was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases