STATE v. BUXTON

No. 24777.

109 Ohio App. 391 (1959)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BUXTON, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County.

Decided June 25, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mrs. Gertrude B. Mahon and Mr. Bernard Stuplinski, for appellee.

Mr. Albert G. Levine, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons that:

(1) We find the record discloses evidence of a substantial nature to support the verdict of the jury.

(2) While it is apparent on the face of the record that counsel for the defendant intended to and did make a timely request that the court reduce its charge on the law of the case to the jury to writing by virtue of the provisions of Section 2945.10 (G), Revised Code, the record shows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases