1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 146 Conn.
  5. 146 Conn. 352 (1959)
 

PALOMBIZIO v. MURPHY

146 Conn. 352 (1959)

ANTHONY v. PALOMBIZIO v. JAMES F. MURPHY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 28, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Mansfield, with whom was George W. Ripley, for the appellant (defendant Seremet).

Wallace R. Burke, with whom, on the brief, was Maxwell Heiman, for the appellee (plaintiff).

DALY, C. J., BALDWIN, KING, MURPHY and MELLITZ, JS.

MELLITZ, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries he sustained while riding as a passenger in an automobile operated by the defendant Seremet when it came into collision with an automobile operated by the defendant Murphy. Murphy suffered a default and judgment was rendered against both defendants. Seremet appealed. Assignments of error directed to the subordinate facts found by the trial court are not discussed in Seremet's brief and are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases