WOOD ET UX v. BAKER ET UX


217 Or. 279 (1959)

341 P.2d 134

WOOD ET UX v. BAKER ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded June 17, 1959.

Petition for rehearing denied July 16, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Richard Neely, of La Grande, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Helm & Neely, La Grande.

S.H. Burleigh, of La Grande, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Burleigh & Carey, La Grande.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, WARNER, CRAWFORD and MILLARD, Justices.


REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

MILLARD, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants allowing their costs and disbursements notwithstanding the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $6,000, and further ordering the dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint rendered by the Circuit Court of Union County in a vendees' action for damages on account of fraud. The judgment was entered pursuant to a motion for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases