TULLGREN v. SCHOOL DIST.


6 Wis.2d 481 (1959)

TULLGREN, Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1 OF VILLAGE OF WHITEFISH BAY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Irving A. Puchner, attorney, and Harold W. Story and William E. Shaw of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Puchner.

For the respondent there was a brief by von Briesen & Redmond, attorneys, and George F. Redmond of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by George F. Redmond.


BROADFOOT, J.

The first argument made by the plaintiff is that contracts for the performance of architectural services in connection with the construction of a high school in separate units over a long period of time are valid. In that connection she cites Jacobberger v. School Dist. 122 Or. 124, 256 Pac. 652, and Altman v. Uniontown School Dist. 334 Pa. 336, 5 Atl. (2d) 896. The school district does not take issue with the decisions in those cases but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases