BAUMAN v. GILBERTSON


7 Wis.2d 467 (1959)

BAUMAN, Plaintiff, v. GILBERTSON and others, Defendants and Appellants: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Interpleaded Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Schlotthauer & Jenswold of Madison, and oral argument by John F. Jenswold.

For the respondent there was a brief by Roberts, Boardman, Suhr, Bjork & Curry of Madison, and oral argument by Walter M. Bjork.


CURRIE, J.

The validity of an exclusion clause in a policy of automobile liability insurance, which excludes the named insured from coverage, was upheld by this court in Frye v. Theige (1948), 253 Wis. 596, 34 N.W.2d 793, 50 A. L. R. (2d) 124. In Musselman v. Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 387, 63 N.W.2d 691, we again carefully reviewed the question and adhered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases