STATE v. WILLIAMSON


31 N.J. 16 (1959)

155 A.2d 7

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIFORD T. WILLIAMSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 26, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William C. Brudnick argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Julius E. Kramer argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Conford for the majority of the Appellate Division. The opinion is reported in 54 N.J.Super. 170 (App. Div. 1959).

For purposes of emphasis, we consider it advisable to add our unqualified approval to the observation in the opinion that the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars. Moreover, it seems probable that if the charge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases