1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 269 F.2d
  5. 269 F.2d 203 (1959)
 

HOLLAND FURNACE COMPANY v. F. T. C.

No. 12451.

269 F.2d 203 (1959)

HOLLAND FURNACE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied August 14, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart S. Ball, Chicago, Ill., Robert H. Trenkamp, Cleveland, Ohio, Richard J. Flynn, Chicago, Ill., Edward A. McLeod, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Trenkamp & Coakley, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel.

James E. Corkey, Asst. Gen. Counsel, E. K. Elkins, Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, Miles J. Brown, Washington, D. C., Atty., Federal Trade Commission, for respondent.

Before SCHNACKENBERG and HASTINGS, Circuit Judges, and WHAM, District Judge.

WHAM, District Judge.

Petitioner, Holland Furnace Company, a corporation, filed its petition in this court for review of a final order of the Federal Trade Commission, dated July 7, 1958, which directs Holland to cease and desist from certain practices found to be deceptive and to constitute unfair competition. Thereafter, Holland filed a motion under the provisions of Rule 15(f) of this court, 28 U.S.C.A., moving for a determination of jurisdictional issues in advance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases