1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 219 Or.
  5. 219 Or. 253 (1959)
 

PAGET ET UX v. CITY OF PENDLETON

219 Or. 253 (1959)

346 P.2d 1111

PAGET ET UX v. CITY OF PENDLETON

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur H. Lewis, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was William E. Hanzen, Pendleton.

Robert N. Funk and Gene B. Conklin, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, O'CONNELL, REDDING and KING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendant city of Pendleton from foreclosing a water line extension lien arising out of an assessment made by the defendant against property in the Montee Addition to the city of Pendleton.

In 1955 Mr. William F. Brenner, a contractor and builder, was in the process of developing the Montee Addition which had just been platted, and which consisted of 127 lots. He requested the Pendleton city...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases