1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 169 F.Supp.
  5. 169 F.Supp. 299 (1959)
 

TYNDALL v. CONDUIT AND FOUNDATION CORPORATION

No. 239 of 1956.

169 F.Supp. 299 (1959)

Preston Lee TYNDALL v. CONDUIT AND FOUNDATION CORPORATION.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

January 13, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton M. Borowsky, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

John B. H. Carter, Pepper, Bodine, Frick, Scheetz & Hamilton, Manus McHugh, Strong, Sullivan, Saylor & Ferguson, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

EGAN, District Judge.

This is an admiralty action in personam. Libellant's case follows the usual pattern in that it charges that the carfloats on which libellant was working at the time he suffered injury were unseaworthy; also that respondent was negligent in failing to provide libellant, among other things, with a safe place to work; and that libellant is entitled to maintenance and cure, both past and future.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases