CLAWSON ET UX v. PROUTY ET UX


215 Or. 244 (1959)

333 P.2d 1104

CLAWSON ET UX v. PROUTY ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 14, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George G. Van Natta, St. Helens, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

G.A. Heikkila, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was D.C. Bond, Portland.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, McALLISTER and O'CONNELL, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment adverse to them which the Circuit Court for Columbia County entered in an ejectment action which the plaintiffs, husband and wife, instituted against the defendants, who also are husband and wife. The cause was tried by the judge without a jury and rendition of the judgment was preceded by the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiffs-appellants present only one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases