GOLD v. CHURNIN


18 Misc.2d 440 (1959)

Benjamin Gold, Appellant, v. Edith Churnin et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 26, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil Huttner for appellant.

No appearance for respondents.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The judgment should be unanimously modified on the law by adding interest, costs and disbursements to plaintiff's recovery and as so modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal.

While the court properly limited plaintiff's recovery to the sum of $75, it was error to disallow costs. There was no compliance with the provisions of section 174-a of the Civil Practice Act, and therefore the defendants were not relieved from the payment of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases