1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 7 Wis.2d
  5. 7 Wis.2d 37 (1959)
 

NEHLS v. MEYER

7 Wis.2d 37 (1959)

NEHLS, Respondent, v. MEYER and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 7, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Cavanagh, Mittelstaed, Sheldon, Heide & Hartley of Kenosha, and oral argument by William A. Sheldon.

For the respondent there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Leo E. Vaudreuil.

FAIRCHILD, J.

The crucial findings made by the trial court were that there was valuable consideration for the 1941 deed to Lydia; that Lydia was not in a confidential relationship to Elroy; and that she is not a constructive trustee for the estate of Emma Meyer, their mother. These findings could perhaps be interpreted as findings that the conversations related by Elroy did not take place and since Elroy had the burden of proof, Elroy might be unsuccessful in attacking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases