Plaintiff, a builder of fences, was called to render estimates on a fence to be erected around defendant's tennis courts. Two such estimates were given; one for a chain link fence, the other, at a lower total figure, for a Hex Netting fence. Defendant accepted the latter.
An examination of the two proposals, in the light of the testimony, leads to the inescapable conclusion that plaintiff erred in its proposal for the installation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.