1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 179 F.Supp.
  5. 179 F.Supp. 250 (1959)
 

SHOAF v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. C-110-G-58.

179 F.Supp. 250 (1959)

Floyd R. SHOAF and Uster Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division.

December 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur O. Cooke and David Rabin, Greensboro, N. C., for plaintiffs.

Thornton H. Brooks, Greensboro, N. C., John W. Malley, Washington, D. C., Henry N. Paul, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., and Vaughn, Hudson, Ferrell & Carter, Winston-Salem, N. C., for defendant.

HAYES, District Judge.

In denying the motion for summary judgment, it is sufficient, for the present, to state briefly the reasons therefor. The practice of entering a summary judgment in this circuit has been fully prescribed in Stevens v. Howard D. Johnson Co., 4 Cir., 181 F.2d 390; Pierce v. Ford Motor Co., 4 Cir., 190 F.2d 910; Kirkpatrick v. Consolidated Underwriters, 4 Cir.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases