Per Curiam.
Although actual physical use of the property for an exempting purpose has not yet begun, the property was entitled to be exempted from taxation since it was acquired by the city with the intention of devoting it to a use exempting it from taxation and has not thereafter been devoted to a nonexempt or commercial use. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed on authority of Carney, Aud., v. Cleveland City School District Public...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
