CLAUSEN v. ECKSTEIN


7 Wis.2d 409 (1959)

CLAUSEN, Appellant, v. ECKSTEIN and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Mann & Hayes, attorneys, and William F. Hayes of counsel, all of Ripon, and oral argument by William F. Hayes and by William A. Ritchay of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by McLeod, Donohue & Colwin of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by Joseph D. Donohue.


BROWN, J.

The city engineer is a municipal officer whose duties involve discretion and judgment. The affidavits supporting Carter's motion for summary judgment show without dispute that Carter did not have the ministerial duty of placing warning signs or lights at the excavation and dirt pile. Such duties were those of someone else,—Potter. The rule governing liability of public officers is given in Meyer v. Carman (1955), 271 Wis. 329...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases