GEREMIA v. ADMINISTRATOR


146 Conn. 264 (1959)

ANTHONY GEREMIA v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, ET AL. PHILIP POPPLE ET AL. v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 31, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William K. Cole, with whom, on the brief, was George C. Hastings, for the defendant Fafnir Bearing Company in the first case.

Jose M. Calhoun, for the defendant Royal McBee Corporation in the second case.

Harry Silverstone, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Albert L. Coles, attorney general, for the named defendant in each case.

William S. Zeman, for the plaintiff in each case.

KING, MURPHY, MELLITZ, SHEA and ALCORN, JS.


MELLITZ, J.

The decisive question presented in these cases is whether holiday pay, so-called, is to be considered earned remuneration in determining whether an employee is partially unemployed under the provisions of § 31-229 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958 (Rev. 1949, § 7502), and so entitled to receive partial unemployment benefits. The pertinent portion of the statute reads: "An eligible individual who is partially unemployed throughout a week...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases