HARDWARE MUT. C. CO. v. HARRY CROW & SON, INC.,


6 Wis.2d 396 (1959)

HARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY and another, Respondents, v. HARRY CROW & SON, INC., and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Heft & Coates of Racine, and oral argument by Carroll R. Heft.

For the respondents there was a brief by Cavanagh, Mittelstaed, Sheldon, Heide & Hartley of Kenosha, and oral argument by William A. Sheldon.


FAIRCHILD, J.

Defendants assert that the record will not sustain the jury finding that Orr was negligent, that the damage awards were excessive, and that there were several prejudicial errors upon the trial. Upon our review of the record, we reach the conclusion that defendants' challenges are not well founded and that the judgment is to be affirmed.

1. Findings of negligence. It was conceded that Huber never saw the truck. The jury found that his failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases