1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 220 Md.
  5. 220 Md. 182 (1959)
 

RIDLEY v. STATE

[No. 250, September Term, 1958.]

220 Md. 182 (1959)

151 A.2d 915

RIDLEY v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 5, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton B. Allen, with whom were Brown, Allen & Watts on the brief, for appellant.

Shirley Brannock Jones, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General, J. Harold Grady, State's Attorney for Baltimore City, and Frank J. Marcellino, Assistant State's Attorney for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the appellant, who was convicted of the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle under the Code (1957), Article 27, Section 349, possessed criminal intent, a necessary element of the offense, Anello v. State, 201 Md. 164, when he was physically using an automobile belonging to another. The question of his intention, of course, involved a question of fact. We recently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases