PALLOTA v. GULLO


18 Misc.2d 381 (1959)

Severino S. Pallota et al., Doing Business as Cantalupo Realty Co., Respondents, v. Rose Gullo, Respondent, and Helen Malinowski, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

June 16, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Rosen and Jacob D. Goldzweig for appellant.

Eugene Gibilaro for respondents.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The evidence indicates that after showing the house to defendant-appellant and calling her on the telephone on a single occasion, plaintiffs abandoned their efforts to effect a sale. The property was later sold by another broker who was paid his commission. Under the circumstances, plaintiffs failed to make out a case upon any of the theories asserted (Newberry & Co. v. Warnecke & Co., 267...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases