1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 7 A.D.2d
  5. 7 A.D.2d 388 (1959)
 

AMERELAY, INC. v. DIRECTOMAT, INC.

7 A.D.2d 388 (1959)

Amerelay, Inc., Appellant, v. Directomat, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 24, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ephraim London of counsel (H. Kenneth Haller and Helen L. Buttenwieser with him on the brief; Beer, Richards, Lane, Haller & Buttenwieser, attorneys), for appellant.

Samuel Pivar (Michael F. Parrino with him on the brief), for respondent.

BOTEIN, P. J., BREITEL, RABIN, VALENTE and McNALLY, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, suing on two causes of action, the first for conversion of shares of stock allegedly worth $37,500, and the second for breach of contract seeking damages of $27,895.65, commenced its lawsuit by the attachment of funds in the New York bank account of defendant, a foreign corporation. In its affidavits plaintiff has made a sufficient prima facie showing of the existence of two causes of action,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases