1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 30 N.J.
  5. 30 N.J. 360 (1959)
 

CRONHEIM v. TENNANT

30 N.J. 360 (1959)

153 A.2d 22

DAVID CRONHEIM AND RUTH SAMPSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND RUTH SAMPSON AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HOLDERS OF VOTING TRUST CERTIFICATES FOR CLASS "A" STOCK, AND HOLDERS OF CLASS "B" STOCK OF THE TWENTY-SIX JOURNAL SQUARE CORPORATION IN DISSOLUTION, WHO DID NOT RECEIVE THEIR FIRST, SECOND, OR THIRD LIQUIDATING DIVIDENDS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE G. TENNANT, JR., AND JOHN A. HARTPENCE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max Brustin argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. John A. Hartpence argued the cause for defendants-respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

Appeal is taken from a Superior Court, Chancery Division, judgment, granting defendants' motions for a change of venue and to strike the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim for relief and to dismiss the action with prejudice. Plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified under R.R. 1:10-1(a).

As we view the present litigation, plaintiffs are attempting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases