1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 54 N.J.
  5. 54 N.J. Super. 333 (1959)
 

PIECHOWSKI v. MATARESE

54 N.J. Super. 333 (1959)

148 A.2d 872

WILLIAM J. PIECHOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK R. MATARESE, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

Mr. Burton Peskin argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Alexander Denbo, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court on defendants' motion at the close of plaintiff's case. He urges the following grounds entitling him to a new trial: (1) the evidence established a prima facie case entitling him to have the matter passed upon by the jury; (2) error in the exclusion of evidence concerning his personal habits and background; (3) error in denying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases