FISHER v. CARLIN ET UX


219 Or. 159 (1959)

346 P.2d 641

FISHER v. CARLIN ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 25, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank W. King, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Arthur E. Prag, Portland.

Clayton R. Hess, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hess & Hess, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, O'CONNELL and KING, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

McALLISTER, C.J.

The plaintiff, Flora L. Fisher, brought this action to recover both general and punitive damages from the defendants, Phil and Florence Carlin, husband and wife, for wrongfully trimming and cutting maple trees on plaintiff's property. The jury awarded plaintiff $250 compensatory damages and $2,750 punitive damages and from the judgment based on said verdict, defendants appeal.

1. Defendant's only assignment of error reads...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases