1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 7 Wis.2d
  5. 7 Wis.2d 367 (1959)
 

VANDERBLOEMEN v. SUCHOSKY

7 Wis.2d 367 (1959)

VANDERBLOEMEN and wife, Appellants, v. SUCHOSKY and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1959.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Hanaway & Byrnes, and oral argument by Charles T. Hanaway and by Richard G. Greenwood, all of Green Bay.

For the respondents there was a brief by Everson, Ryan, Whitney & O'Melia of Green Bay, and oral argument by James L. Everson and E. L. Everson.

BROADFOOT, J.

The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in submitting questions in the special verdict with reference to the negligence of Leo Vanderbloemen for the reason that he was confronted by an emergency.

Leo Vanderbloemen testified that the collision occurred before he reached the curve in the highway; that when Suchosky came around the curve he was driving on the east side of the highway, which was to Suchosky's left; that he continued to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases