Per Curiam.
Three charges of professional misconduct were filed against the respondent. The Referee sustained all of them and the evidence adduced before him amply supports his conclusion.
It was established that the respondent converted money entrusted to him for a specific purpose by a client. He admitted that he altered a Supreme Court order, without the permission, consent or approval of a Justice of that court. The record discloses that the respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
